![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
wayfaring gary e. davis |
January 6, 2016 |
|||||||
The “humanistic union” journal will get revision and amplification soon, but it’s a creature of its time that I’m wanting to let be. I love it, like one may love an era of their life: integral to moving on. Yet, its themes will be integral to a sense of post-religious humanism that is involved with a lot of 21st century materials, beyond the reservations about humanism expressed by Heidegger, 1946. I feel close to closure on “Habermasian studies” for near-term years, but there are many tens of pages of material (maybe hundreds—who knows, with digital files, including discussion group posts going back to 1997) that I could take time to transpose into useful presentation, in view of others’ interest. Also, many essays by him will one day be appropriated into my project. And I want to give lots of fair attention to Postmetaphysical Thinking II, which is supposed to be available in English later this year. “Discursive reading” was intended for a reader who is unfamiliar with hermeneutical talk. But it’s not an expository introduction to hermeneutics; it’s my own agenda. Yet, it’s a hermeneutical agenda that is not intended to be conceptually demanding. (Maybe I’m misleading myself there.) I do play with language (e.g., “ensiting”), but maybe I’m not too confounding. I want to re-think that excursion, but in the meantime, it may be useful to others. Probably, it should remain as something belonging to 2007. Material that I have had for years, readily applicable for carrying on here, would easily make a book (or two). I’m more interested in the 21st century in light of influences. Retrospective writing feels like a luxury for later years. I’m beginning an “Appropriations” section, which names a place for whatever I feel like doing that draws substantially (though probably not admittedly) on work done years back, oriented by a sense of philosophy as progressive conceptual appropriativity. For example, “toying with the intellectual” is oriented by recent concerns about a longstanding area of interest, implicitly drawing on desire to further my sense of Appropriative philosophy, but tending to do so in terms of others’ recent material.
|
||||||||
Be fair. © 2016, g. e. davis. | ||||||||